Larger school districts less likely to meet AYP

By Rosalie Everson
Posted 12/2/08

FORT LUPTON — It’s usually the big school districts that bring home the tallest team trophies.  But when it comes to the percentage of students making adequate yearly progress in …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

Username
Password
Log in

Don't have an ID?


Print subscribers

If you're a print subscriber, but do not yet have an online account, click here to create one.

Non-subscribers

Click here to see your options for becoming a subscriber.

If you made a voluntary contribution in 2022-2023 of $50 or more, but do not yet have an online account, click here to create one at no additional charge. VIP Digital Access includes access to all websites and online content.


Our print publications are advertiser supported. For those wishing to access our content online, we have implemented a small charge so we may continue to provide our valued readers and community with unique, high quality local content. Thank you for supporting your local newspaper.

Larger school districts less likely to meet AYP

Posted

FORT LUPTON — It’s usually the big school districts that bring home the tallest team trophies.  But when it comes to the percentage of students making adequate yearly progress in reading and math, the smallest districts in the state, those with 373 students or less, finished first.

    The students in only 78 districts, less than half of Colorado’s 183 school districts, made AYP this year.  Not one of the 50 districts with more than 2,000 students made the cut, but 36 of the smallest 50 districts did.

    That’s significant, Scott Graham, Re-8’s director of consolidated grants said, because most of Colorado’s public school students – 91.1 percent – are in the 50 largest districts.  Only 3.36 percent go to schools that made AYP in 2008.

    Before everyone rushes to send their child over the mountains to say, Rangely or Meeker (two of the districts that made AYP), it’s important to look at why the bigger districts are “failing,” Graham said.

    In the Department of Colorado Education’s world, it’s not the percentage of students that make AYP; it’s the number of targeted subgroups, categories that are separated by race, ethnic groups, poverty, Individual Education Plans, and the number of students receiving free or reduced lunch plus combinations of categories.

    The larger the district, the more likely it is to include all the target groups and the less likely to meet the state’s requirements.  The districts that made AYP had an average of 33 targets, the largest districts, those that had an average enrollment of over 7,000, had to meet 83.

    Because the CDE raised the educational limbo stick this year, 25 districts that were deemed successful last year weren’t this year, Graham found.

    In Re-8 schools, total scores rose. But because math and reading for students with disabilities didn’t make the targets in the middle school, reading and math for Hispanic, English language learners and Economically disadvantaged students missed in the high school and economically disadvantaged and ESL students fell short of the goal in Butler Elementary, the district was among those districts that did not make AYP.

 

Comments

Our Papers

Ad blocker detected

We have noticed you are using an ad blocking plugin in your browser.

The revenue we receive from our advertisers helps make this site possible. We request you whitelist our site.